up v3 $UP

DEX / predictionCLEANGO-WITH-CONDITIONSaudited: Shieldifylive
Revenue 7d
$394k
24h $48k · 30d $1.4M
Holder revenue 7d
$394k
30d $1.4M · P/HR 0.28x
Fees 7d
$654k
24h $70k · 30d $2.3M
Market cap
$5.8M
FDV $194.1M
P/R, 7d annualised
0.28x
on FDV 9.45x · P/fees 0.17x
Price
$0.3832
-7.7% 24h · vol $887k · liq $1.6M

Revenue by window

Every window annualised, so the multiples are comparable. A short window on a young protocol is noisy, and a window longer than the protocol's earning history is marked.

WindowEarnedHolder revFeesAnnualised revTrendP/RP/HR
24h$48k$48k$70k$17.5M-9%0.33x0.33x
7d$394k$394k$654k$20.5M-34%0.28x0.28x
30d$1.4M$1.4M$2.3M$17.2M+2%*0.34x0.34x
Since launch (58.3 days)$1.7M$1.7M$2.7M$10.7M0.54x0.54x

Revenue basis

DefiLlama revenue line for up v3. Our audit valued CollectFees at $967k against the $1.30M line over the same window, with 44 minor fee tokens unvalued and accrued-but-uncollected gauge fees excluded, so the line is in the right range. All of it goes to veUP voters.

StreamKindEnforcedNote
Trading fees to veUP votersholder payoutcodeFee path runs pool to gauge to FeesVotingReward for veUP voters; no treasury recipient in the path. Unlocked UP holders have no fee claim
Weekly emissionsexcludedcode10.5M to 11.5M UP minted per epoch, 5% to the Minter team; dilution, not revenue

Locked supply is the whole story: 88.8% in permanent veUP locks. Unlocked holders get no fees.

Launch screen CLEAN

No coordination signal: 0 buys in the first 50 blocks after pool creation; the first swap came 157 blocks later (one 0.1 ETH buy). A 24 KB contract received 88.8% of supply at mint; its role was not decoded.

Method: replay from mint, decode every swap in the first 50 blocks after the first pool, group same-block buys by gas price and amount, trace first token funding. Timing and gas never prove common ownership on their own.

Token audit (ours) GO-WITH-CONDITIONS

A $5,000 sell computes to about 1.06% below spot and a 293,000 UP sell (1.6% of the 18.0M non-treasury float) to 6.9% below, with 100 executed sells in the last 200k blocks and no owner, pause, blacklist, tax or upgrade path on the token. 88.8% of supply sits in veUP as permanent locks: 200M under 0xdead that cannot be recovered and 200M locked by the project Safe for at least four years after an unlock call, which is why market cap is 3 to 4% of FDV. Conditions: one 2-of-4 Safe with no timelock holds every admin role and 44.7% of voting power, weekly emissions dilute unlocked holders who have no fee claim, and whether the Minter can reassign mint rights is unverified.

  • A-1: UP runtime has minter-gated mint and burnFrom only; no owner, pause, blacklist, fee, proxy slot, CALL or DELEGATECALL
  • A-3: The 2-of-4 Safe 0x0eEA holds every protocol admin role (factory owner, fee managers, Voter governor, emergency council, VE team, Minter team) with no timelock
  • A-4: The token exposes setMinter and the current minter is the Minter contract; whether the Minter can forward that call is unverified
  • B-1: Canonical liquidity is unlocked CL positions in the WETH/UP 1% pool, 98.8% staked in the gauge; position ownership not replayed
  • C-1: 100 of 196 swaps in a 200k-block window were UP sells; the largest, 32,200 UP for 7.9 WETH, executed 1.7% below spot
  • C-2: From pinned pool state, 8,000 UP degrades 1.06%, 293,000 UP 6.9%, 1M UP 30.8%
  • D-1: The VotingEscrow 0x5d32 holds 448.7M of 505.1M UP; 446.5M of escrow supply is permanent
  • D-2: Lock 1 (200M) is owned by 0xdead; locks 2 and 3 (100M each) are owned by the Safe; a permanent lock needs four years after unlockPermanent before withdrawal
  • D-3: Non-treasury float is 18.0M UP, about $11.3M, matching the DexScreener market cap band against a $315.7M FDV
  • G-1: Epochs mint 10.5M to 11.5M UP each (rising 3% per epoch, 5% to the Minter team); the Voter burns about 9M unvoted emissions per epoch; the Safe itself burned 20M UP

Pinned 2026-09-07. Surfaces: A controls, B liquidity custody, C sellability, D concentration, E launch, F fees, G rights, H dependencies. A critical on any surface caps the verdict.

Professional audit audited: Shieldify

Shieldify's own portfolio hosts the report and names both repos and commit hashes, so the audit is real. The audited commits are not resolvable on the public branches and nothing ties them to the deployed Robinhood Chain addresses, so the deployed-scope match is unknown. All findings were acknowledged without code changes. The base code is a Velodrome v2 / Slipstream fork.

  • Shieldify (2026-07-21): up-contracts (ve(3,3) core: escrow, voter, minter, gauges; Velodrome v2 lineage) and up-slipstream (CL engine, Slipstream lineage) at two commit hashes; 80 hours; 3 medium, 3 low, 4 info, all acknowledged with no code changes · deployed-scope match unknown

Self-reported: up. docs security page lists the review and the deployed Robinhood Chain addresses

Checked 2026-09-07, confidence high. A professional audit reviews contract code for bugs. It does not cover tokenomics, launch fairness, or who holds the keys.

Contracts

Data sources

Fees and revenue
DefiLlama: up-v3
Market data
DexScreener pair 0x23D641FeCcD207E8794c593e8240444A0674C4Ba
Chain
Robinhood Chain, id 4663
Refreshed
Fri, 11 Sep 2026 07:05:15 GMT

← back to the ranking